5/19/2023 0 Comments Caboodle makeup case targetRespondents were required to be 18 years of age or older to participate. A largely respected company that hosts a large opt-in panel database, Kantar, was used to obtain survey respondents. The survey was administered from July 16th until July 28th 2019 using Qualtrics, an online survey tool, to accumulate household demographic information, perceptions of health and animal well-being of different prominent animal welfare organizations, and self-reported familiarity with veterinary medical practices and procedures by U.S. Īn online survey instrument, approved by the university’s Institutional Review Board (IRB), was designed to elicit information related to public perceptions of veterinary medical services along with self-reported experience with those services. Previous studies have questioned whether people utilize different organizations as information sources because they are more trusted than others or because they are more easily accessible or recognizable than others. Animal well-being-focused organizations might share similar stated goals, but each have their own agendas, structure and vision. residents’ concern for animal welfare gave rise to different non-profit and for-profit organizations focused on animal well-being and health care for pet animals and animals raised for food (i.e., livestock and poultry industries). For animal agriculture, the treatment of farm animals is a central concern for livestock and poultry producers, not an isolated activist debate anymore. In the case of pet animals, the increase in concern is likely connected to the increase in identification of pets as much more than just companions for example, as family members. The rate of pet ownership in the United States was estimated at 57% at year-end for 2016. In recent decades, concerns for the quality of life of animals has increasingly become the subject of public policy and controversy. residents can access information on animal well-being and health care from different sources: word of mouth, television, veterinarians, the Internet and, more specifically and increasingly, popular social media. Public perceptions of animal well-being and health care are the focus of increasing debate. The ASPCA’s perceived impact on pet animal well-being and health care may be linked to their high level of recognition among respondents, as this was the organization that respondents most frequently reported having seen/heard stories related to animal well-being and health care. Consistent with the Likert-scale results, the ASPCA was ranked as the most impactful organization. A best–worst scaling (BWS) choice experiment was conducted with 7 of the initial 13 organizations to elicit relative rankings by forcing tradeoffs by respondents. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) had the highest perceived average impact, while People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) had the lowest. Using a Likert-scale, respondents ranked 13 prominent organizations as having a low to high impact on pet animal well-being and health care. residents was used to understand the perceived impact of organizations with self-stated dedication to pet animal well-being. residents’ perceptions of the impact of prominent animal welfare and veterinary care organizations on pet animal well-being and health care may not be linked to the organization’s stated mission and effectiveness in advancing it, but to the level of recognition people have for the groups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |